CONTENTS
Origin of the Cross.
Yoni.
Unity.
Phallic and Sun Worship.
The Phallus in California.
Author's Afterword
Far back in the twilight
of the pictured history of the past, the cross is found on the
borders of the river Nile. A horizontal piece of wood fastened to an
upright beam indicated the hight of the water in flood. This formed a
cross, the Nileometer. If the stream failed to rise a certain hight
in its proper season, no crops and no bread was the result. From
famine on the one hand to plenty on the other, the cross came to be
worshiped as a symbol of life and regeneration, or feared. as an
image. of decay and death. This is one, so called, origin of the
Cross.
The cross was a symbol
of life and regeneration in India long before this usage on the Nile,
and for another reason. The most learned antiquarians agree in
holding it unquestionable that Egypt was colonized from India, and
crosses migrated with the inhabitants. "Proofs in adequate
confirmation of this point are found," says
the learned Dr. G. L. Ditson, "in waifs brought to light in
ancient lore. Waif originally signified goods a thief, when pursued,
threw away to avoid detection. Many of the facts to be brought forth
in our inquiry were doubtless intentionally scattered and put out of
sight to prevent apprehension of the proper subject to which they
belong."
The cross bespeaks
evolution in religion. It is the product of time, and the relic of
the revered past. It begins with one thing and ends with another.
In seeking for the
origin of the cross it becomes necessary to direct attention in some
degree to the forms of faith among mankind with whom the cross is
found. Retrogressive inquiry enables the religio-philosophical
student to follow the subject back, if not to its source, to the
proximate neighborhood of its source. Like every item of
ecclesiastical ornament, and every badge of devotion, the cross is
the embodiment of a symbol. That symbol represents a fact, or facts,
of both structure and office. The facts were
generation and
regeneration. Long before the mind matures the generative
structure matures. The
cerebellum attains its natural size at
three years of age, the
cerebrum at seven years, if we accept
the measurements as announced by Sir William Hamilton. Throughout the
realm of animal life there is no physical impulse so overbearing as
the generative, unless we except that for food. Food gives
satisfaction. Rest to tired nature gives pleasure. To the power of
reproduction is appended the acme of physical bliss. How natural,
then, that this last-named impulse should, early in human
development, take the lead, give direction and consequence to
religious fancies, and lead its votaries captive to a willing
bondage,--as it did in India, Egypt, among the Buddhists, Babylonians, Phœnicians,
Assyrians, and ancient Hebrews.
The ancients personified
the elements, air, water, fire, the earth, the sea, the celestial
orbs; in imagination gave superintending Deities to some and deified
others. The Sexual ability of man and Nature was also personified,
and likewise supplied with a governing Deity, which was elevated to
the niche of the Supreme. Once enthroned as the ruling God over all,
dissent therefrom was impious. A king might be obeyed, but God must
be worshiped. A monarch could compel obedience to the state, but the
ministers of God lured the devotee to the shrines of Isis and Venus
on the one hand, and to Bacchus and Priapus or Baal-Peor on the
other, by appealing to the most animating and sensuous force of our
physical nature. The name of this God bore different appellatives in
different languages, among which we find Al, El, Il, Ilos, On, Bel,
Jao, Jah, Jak, Josh, Brahma, Eloihim, Jupiter, and Jehovah. Being God
of the genital power, he became the reputed sire of numerous
children, and numberless children were born under his auspicious
rule. The names of his dutiful descendants were composite in
signification, and in many, ways characterized the honored Deity.
Hence, derived therefrom, we meet with the El God in Micha
el,
Ragu
el, Rapha
el, Gabra
el, Jo
el, Phani
el,
Uri
el, Saraki
el, Beth
el, Chap
el,
Eli,
Elijah.
Al, El, Il, are used
interchangeably, one for the other; likewise Jah, Ju, Jao, Yho, Iah,
Iao, Iu. On expresses the idea of the male Creator. Am, Om, Um, or
Umma, represent the female Deity. From Am we have Amelia and Emma. On
is an integrant of many names, as Abd
on,
Onan, Aijal
on,
Ashcal
on, Ezb
on. From Ra, Re, or Ri, arise
Rebekah,
Regem,
Rehoboam, and
Reba,
which signifies "sexual
congress." The cognomens in which Jah enters are almost
unlimited, as in Isa
iah, Hezek
iah, Zedek
iah,
Pad
iah, Man
iah,
Jehu.
The attributes of this
presiding Deity were characteristic of his office. Her was strong,
powerful, erect, high, firm, bright, upright, happy, large, splendid,
noble, mighty, hard, able. Corresponding to the same idea, he was
often, indeed nearly always, associated in pictured relics with
animals which denoted the above qualities. These were the bull,
elephant, ass, goat, ram, and lion, which were typical of strength
and salacious vigor. When a large and strong man appeared, he at once
resembled the prevalent idea of God, and was most naturally called
the man of God, or the God-man; also large, strong animals were noted
as the bulls of God, the rams of God.
The meaning of a large
number of Bible names verifies this view. From Dr. Inman's Vocabulary
of Bible Names I set out to copy those the signification of which
related to "divine," sexual, generative, or creative power;
such as Alah, "the strong one"; Ariel, "the strong Jah
is El"; Amasai, "Jah is firm"; Asher "the male"
or "the upright organ"; Elijah, "El is Jah";
Eliab, "the strong father"; Elisha, "El is upright";
Ara, "the strong one," "the hero"; Aram, "high,"
or, "to be uncovered"; Baalshalisha, "my Lord the
trinity," or, "my God is three"; Ben-zohett, "son
of firmness"; Camon, "the erect On"; Cainan, "he
stands upright"; but after copying over one hundred names with
their meaning--some of which related to feminine qualities--I found I
had advanced only to the letter E of the alphabet, and gave up the
undertaking for these limited pages.
We must look at this
curious subject as we find it. Quaint though most of it is, we hope
to treat it with all
the decorum of
philosophic inquiry, and in the chaste language of scientific
precision.
That the cross, or
crucifix, has a sexual origin we determine by a similar rule of
research as that by which comparative anatomists determine the place
and habits of an animal by a single tooth. The cross is a metaphoric
tooth which belongs to an antique religious body physical, and that
essentially human. A study of some of the earliest forms of faith
will lift the vail and explain the mystery.
India, China, and Egypt
have furnished the world with a
genus of religion. Time and
culture have divided and modified it into many species and countless
varieties. However much the imagination was allowed to play upon it,
the animus of that religion was sexuality--worship of the generative
principle of man and nature, male and female. The cross became the
emblem of the male feature, under the term of the
triad--three
in one. The female was the unit; and, joined to the male triad,
constituted a sacred four. Rites and adoration were sometimes paid to
the male, sometimes to the female, or to the two in one.
From motives of improved
modesty, or the less commendatory motive to gain prestige through the
power of superstition, much truth bearing directly upon our subject
has been suppressed by an interested hierarchy. Stripped of
euphemisms, we find "the Chaldees believed in a Celestial
Virgin, who had purity of body, loveliness of form, and tenderness of
person; and to whom the erring sinner could appeal with more chance
of success than to a stern father. She was portrayed with a child in
her arms. Her full womb was thought to be teeming with blessings,
and everything which
could remind a votary of a lovely woman was adopted into her
worship."
The worship of the woman
by man naturally led to developments which our comparatively
sensitive natures shun, as being opposed to all religious feeling.
But among a people whose language was without the gloss of modern
politeness, whose priests both spoke and wrote without the least
disguise, and whose God, through his prophets and lawgivers, promised
abundance of offspring and an increase in flocks and herds, as one of
the greatest blessings he had to bestow, we can readily believe that
what we call "obscenities" might be regarded as sacred
homage or divine emblems. What were these emblems? When plainness of
speech is restored to its original office, and the meaning of words
is defined or traced to their primitives, names of natural objects
give us this wonderful answer, and tell us the homely story of these
emblems.
EMBLEMS.
The Phallus and Linga,
or Lingham, Stood for the image of the
male organ; and the
Yoni, or Unit, for the
female organ.
PHALLUS.
Privy member (membrum
virile) signifies, "he breaks through, or passes into."
This word survives in German
pfahl, and
pole in
English. Phallus is supposed to be of Phœnician origin, the
Greek word
pallo, or
phallo, "to brandish
preparatory to throwing a missile," is so near in assonance and
meaning to phallus that one is quite likely to be parent of the
other. In Sanskrit it can be traced to
phal, "to burst,"
"to produce," "to be fruitful;" then, again,
phal is "a plowshare," and is also the name of Siva and
Mahadeva, who are Hindu Deities. Phallus, then, was the ancient
emblem of creation: a Divinity who was companion to Bacchus. Figure
1. is a copy of a statuette of this Hindu Devi. The figure holds a
phallus, or lingham, in the left hand, formed after an imaginary
lotus bud. The coarsely carved unit of the feminine figure completes
ale dogma of masculine and feminine powers combined in one. The son
of Reuben, Phallu (Gen. xlvi, 9), signifies "a distinguished
one," "he splits, divides," "he is round and
plump," all of which point to a religion of sensual love.
Phallic emblems abounded
at Heliopolis in Syria, and many other places,

Fig. 1.
even into modern times. The following unfolds marvelous proof
to our point. A brother physician, writing to Dr. Inman, says: "I
was in Egypt last winter (1865-66), and there certainly are numerous
figures of Gods and kings, on the walls of the temple at Thebes,
depicted with the male genital erect. The great temple at Karnak is,
in particular, full of such figures, and the temple of Danclesa
likewise, though that is of much later date, and built merely in
imitation of old Egyptian art. The same inspiring
bass-reliefs
are pointed out by Ezek. xxiii, 14. I remember one scene of a king
(Rameses II.) returning in triumph with captives, many of whom are
undergoing the operation of castration, and in the corner of the
picture are numerous heaps of the
complete genitals which
have been cut off--many hundreds in all, I should think." This
shows, first, how largely virility was interwoven with religion;
second, how completely English Egyptologists have suppressed a
portion of the facts in the histories which they have given to the
world; third, it tells us of the antiquity of the practice, which
still obtains among the negroes of North Africa, of mutilating
entirely every male captive and slain enemy. See 2 Kings xx, 18; Isa.
xxxix, 7. This vindictive usage was practiced by Saul and David, as
may be seen in 1 Sam. xviii, 25, 27, when the king demands a hundred
foreskins.
David, more heartless
than Saul, doubled the quantity and brought two hundred of the vulgar
trophies. Also Isaiah (xxxix, 7) intimidates the people, and says,
"Thy sons that shall issue from the . . . shall be eunuchs in
the palace of the king of Babylon." The Apache Indians of
California and Arizona delight in perpetrating the same barbarous
mutilations upon captives and the slain.
Dr. Ginsingburg, in
"Kitto's Cyclopædia," says: "Another primitive
custom which obtained in the patriarchal age was, that the one who
took the oath put his hand under the thigh of the adjurer (Gen. xxiv,
2, and xlvii, 29). This practice evidently arose from the fact that
the genital member, which is meant by the euphemic expression, thigh,
was regarded as the most sacred part of the body, being the symbol of
union in the tenderest relation of matrimonial life, and the seat
whence all issue proceeds, and the perpetuity so much coveted by the
ancients. Compare Gen. xlvi, 26; Exod, i, 5; Judg. viii, 30. Hence
the creative organ became the symbol of the Creator and the object of
worship among all nations of antiquity. It is for this reason that
God claimed it as a sign of the covenant between himself
and his chosen people in the rite of circumcision. Nothing therefore
could render the oath more solemn in those days than touching the
symbol of creation, the sign of the covenant, and the source of that
issue who may at any future period avenge the breaking a compact made
with their progenitor." From this we learn that Abraham, himself
a Chaldee, had reverence for the phallus as an emblem of the Creator.
We also learn the rite of circumcision touches phallic or lingasic
worship. From Herodotus we are informed the Syrians learned
circumcision from the Egyptians, as did the Hebrews. Says Dr. Inman:
"I do not know any thing which illustrates the difference
between ancient and modern times more than the frequency with which
circumcision is spoken of in the sacred books, and the carefulness
with which the subject is avoided now. To speak of any man as being
worthy or contemptible, as men and women did among the Jews,
according to the condition of an organ never named, and very rarely
alluded to, in a mixed company of males and females among ourselves,
shows us that persons holding such ideas must have thought far more
of these matters, and spoken of them more freely, than we have been
taught to do. Abundance of offspring is the absorbing promise to the
faithful; a promise liable to fail except the parts destined to that
purpose were in an appropriate condition."
We can compass some idea
of the esteem in which people in former times cherished the male or
phallic emblems of creative power when we note the sway that power
exercised over them. If these organs were lost or disabled, the
unfortunate one was unfitted to meet in the congregation of the Lord,
and disqualified to minister in the holy temples.
Excessive was the punishment inflicted upon the person who should
have the temerity to injure the sacred structure. If a woman were
guilty of inflicting such injury, her hand should be cut off without
pity (Deut. xxv, 12). It was an unpardonable offense, a sin not to be
forgiven, for it was a calamity that bumbled their God and made him
of no esteem. When his ability failed, respect for him failed. Such a
man was "an abomination."
With a people enslaved
to such groveling tenets, it was an easy and natural step from the
actual to the symbolical; from the crude, and, perhaps, to some,
offensive, to the improved, the pictured, the adorned, the less
offensive; from the plain and self-evident, to the mixed, disguised
and mystified; from the unclothed privy member to the letter
T,
or the cross; for these became the phallic analogues. The linga is
the symbol of the male organ and Creator in Hindostan. It is always
represented standing in the yoni, as in Figs. 4 and 23. Obelisks,
pillars of any shape, stumps, trees denuded of boughs, upright
stones, are some of the means by which the male element was
symbolized. Siva is represented as a stone standing alone.
TRIAD.
To know exactly who is
who, and what is what, it will be necessary to explain the Triad, or
Trinity, its origin and its changes or metamorphoses: then the
tria
juncta in uno--the three in one--can be recognized in the cross
more readily than most people see the "three persons in one
God." The triad generally belongs to the male, although the
female Divinities were sometimes of triple constitution. If we turn
to the analysis of the subject according to Rawason, we find that the
first and most sacred
trinity--three persons and one God---consisted of Asshur, or Asher,
or Ashur, whose several names were
Il,
Ilos, and
Ra;
Anu and
Hed, or
Hoa. Beltis was the Goddess
associated with him. These four, that is, Asher, Anu, Hea, and
Beltis, made up
Arba, or Arba-il, the four great Gods, the
quadrilateral, the perfect Creator. Asher was the phallus, or the
linga, the
membrum virile--the privy member; the cognomen
Anu
was given to the right testis, while that of
Hea designated
the left testis. When Asher was canonized a Deity, it was but right
and natural his ever-attendent appendages should be deified with him.
The idea thus broached receives confirmation when we examine the
opinions which obtained in ancient times respecting the power of the
right side of the body compared with the titles given to Ann. It was
believed that the right testicle produced masculine seed, and that
when males were begotten they were developed in the right side of the
womb. Benjamin signifies "son of my right side;" thus the
name of a member of a family attests the reigning notion. The name
Benoni, given to the same individual by his mother, may mean,
literally, either "son of Anu," or "son of my On."
The male, or active, principle was typified by the idea of
"solidity," and "firmness"; and the female, or
passive, principle by "water," "fluidity," or
"softness." It is then,
a priori, probable that Anu
was the name of the testis on the right side. To inspect the perfect
man, or a correctly designed statue of Apollo Belvidere, will detect
the fact that the right "egg" hangs on a higher level than
the left, for which there is an anatomical reason. The metaphors we
sometimes hear, such as "king of the lower world," "the
original chief," "father of the Gods," "the old
Anu," relate to these parts, and are of phallic import. "King
of the lower world" cannot refer to the "infernal regions"
of modern orthodoxy, since that mythical Hades had not then come into
existence,
How about the gland on
the left side, the third divinity of the triad? Rawlinson states, as
best he could determine, this was named Hea or Hoa, and he considers
this Deity corresponds to Neptune. Neptune was the presiding Deity of
the great deep, "Ruler of the Abyss," and "King of
Rivers." He also regulates aqueducts, and waters generally.
There is a correspondence between this Deity and Bacchus.
As Darwin and his
coadjutors teach, mankind, in common with all animal life, originally
sprung from the sea, so physiology teaches that each individual bas
origin in a pond of water. The fruit of man is both solid and fluid.
It was natural to imagine that the two male appendages had a distinct
duty: that one formed the infant, the other the water in which it
lived; that one generated the male and the other the female
offspring;
[1]
and the inference was then drawn that water must be feminine, the
emblem of the passive powers of creation. The use of water would then
become the emblem of it new birth--"born of water;" and it
would represent the phenomenon which occurs when the being first
emerges into day. The night, which favors connubial intercourse, and
the dark interior of the womb, in which for many months, the new
creature is gradually formed, are represented by the "darkness
brooding." It was night when the world was formed out of chaos;
likewise it was thought to be obscure when the
mingling of the male and female fluids started a new being into
existence. Favoring food fed the tiny speck for months, and its
emerging as male or female into the world of men was the prototype of
the emergence of animal life from the bosom of earth, or the womb of
time, into actual existence.
Having dwelt on stem and
branches of the god Asher, it is proper to give his definition as a
personality and function; in other words, as a God. Asher (Gen. xxx,
13), "to be straight," "upright," "fortunate,"
"happy," "happiness," i. e.,
unus cui membrum
erectum est vel fascinum ipsum--the erect virile member charmed
with the act of its proper function. Says Dr, Inman: "While
attending hospital practice in London, I heard a poor Irishman
apostrophize his diseased organ as 'You father of thousands'; and in
the same sense Asher is the father of the Gods. I find that a
corresponding part of the female (
pudenda) is currently called
"the mother of all saints." Asher was the supreme God of
the Assyrians, the Vedic God Mahadeva, the emblem of the human male
structure and creative energy. This idea of the Creator is still to
be seen in India, Egypt, Judea, the East, Phœnicia, the
Mediterranean, Europe, Denmark, depicted on stone relics.
This much for Asher
seemed necessary to explain the origin of the Trinity. So we find
the
male privy member and the adjacent twin testes made the Triad,
and constructed into the pictured formula thus:
A
S
H
E
R
ANU HEA
With this glossary we
can now understand the hidden meaning of Psa. cxxvii, 3, "Children
are an heritage of the Lord, and the fruit of the womb is his
reward." Exactly! Anu is Assyrian. There is a God in Babylon by
the name of Anu. Asher is only another name for Al, On, Ra, Il, El,
Hos, Helos, Bel, Baal, Allah, Elohim. These are also sometimes given
to the run as the representative of the Creator and the phallic
emblem. Asher, Anu, and Hea, three persons and one God, or, as modern
theologians have been led to speak of the Trinity, "the more
three because one, and the more one because three." One, by
himself, is of no value, but "
all work together for
good."
VOCABULARY.
In all ages and all
localities of the world, people conferred names which imply some one
or more characteristics of person, feature, faith, place, or event.
Among defectively educated people, and those of rough manners, we
find "Long John," "Broad Bottom," "Squinting
Dick"; and names for helpless children, "Makepeace,"
"Faithful," "Freelove" and "Praise God
Barebones." In this matter the people of antiquity appear to
have set the example. The Greeks had "Theodore," "the
gift of God"; "Theophilus," "the friend of God."
The analysis of the following vocabulary of Bible names throws a
flood of light on the subject in hand. It unvails an interesting
question, the nudity of which, for the most part, has been clothed
with the vesture of words.
Ahumai (I Chron. iv, 2),
"ach is mi," or "semen"; Baal-Shalisha (2 Kings
iv, 42), "my Lord the trinity," "my Lord is three,"
"the triple male genitals."
Amorite, "speaking,
flowing"; "erecting, or swelling up."
Ankura, "a sprout,
or intumescence," "an erection."
Aram, "high,"
"to swell up," "to be uncovered or naked."
Aras, "to erect,"
"to build," "a nuptial bed."
Asahel, "to
create," "to beget," "El-created."
Baal-Peor (Num. xxv, 3),
"the maiden's hymen opener," "my Lord the opener."
Baal-Perazim, "Baal
of the fissure."
Baal-Tamar, "Baal
the palm tree," "my Lord who is or causes to be erect."
Benoni, "son of
Anu," or "son of my On," "son of my God."
Ben-zoheth, "son of
firmness," "to set up," "an erection," "a
cippus."
Beren, "the womb,"
"the round belly," "the female organs."
Boladan, "my Lord
of pleasure and delight."
Buli, "the vulva,"
"the belly,"
Cainan, "he stands
upright," "Hermes."
Camon, "the erect
On."
Chesil, "the loins
or flanks." Loins is an euphemism for the male genitals.
Cyrus, "the bended
bow," "the abdomen of a pregnant woman."
Dimon, "river,
place"; "the semen, or viscous discharge of On."
Dodai, "loving,
amatory."
Ehud, "conjugation,
union"; "strong," "powerful," "the
one."
Eliasaph, "El the
fascinator."
Elisha, "El is,"
"the erect El."
Elkana, "El the
erect One," "the tall reed," "El burning with
desire."
Elkoshi, "El the
hard One."
En-am, "the eye or
fountain of the mother."
En-an, "the eye of
On, or Anu."
Epaphroditus, "Love
was my parent," "given by Venus."
Epher, "a calf,"
"a faun," "to join," "be strong."
Esau, "to make, to
press, to dig, to build up, to squeeze immodestly," "the
hairy El."
Eshek (1 Chron. viii,
39), "he presses, squeezes, penetrates into."
Eshton, "the power
of woman."
Ether, "fullness,"
a God in the second Assyrian triad, his colleagues being the Sun and
Moon. His name may be read as
Eva,
Iva, Air, Aer, Aur,
Er, Ar, also Vul.
Ethnan, "a harlot's
fee," "begotton by harlotry."
Eve,
Chavah,
havah, or
hauah, "to breathe," "to
blow," "eagerness," "lust"; "a cleft,
fissure, or gap really, a fissure." (Concha).
Evi, "desire."
Ezem, "to fit
firmly to one another," "hard."
Gaal, "the proud or
erect Al."
Galah, "To be,"
or "to be naked," as in gala days.
Gath, "A wine
press," also "a slit, pit, hole, well," or the
euphemism for the vulva.
Gaza, "strong,"
"the trunk of a tree," "a phallic emblem."
Gilboa, "the sun is
Baal."
Gilgal, "a wheel,"
a "circle, "the sun's heap of stones," "a
phallus"; see also Figure 2.

Fig.
2.
Giloh, "the
revealer," "to be or make naked," "to uncover,"
"to disclose."
Ginath, "the
virgins," "the goddesses."
Ginnethon, "the
power of the virgins."
Gomorrah, "a
fissure, a cleft."
Habakkuk, "embrace
of love."
Hai, Assyrian ai,
"female power of the Sun."
Hamor, "the
swelling up one," or "the red one," to be dark red,"
"sudden in rising," also "an ass"--which is
notorious for salacity. "My beloved is white and ruddy"
(Sol. Songs, v, 10).
Hashupa, "uncovering,"
"nakedness."
Hephzibah, "pure
delight," "my delight in her."
Jaaz, "he is hard,
firm, stiff," "he rules," "decides."
Jabal, "he
rejoices," "he flows out," "he is strong."
Jabok, "running, or
flowing forth."
Jabash, "a stout,
fat one."
Jachin, "he
strengthens," "to be hot with desire," "to have
intercourse." Boaz has the same phallic meaning.
Jahdo, "he unites."
Jahaz, "Jah
shines," "to be fair," "to be proud," "he
is firm."
Jahdial, "El makes
glad."
Jair, "enlightens,"
"shines," "blooms," "flows." Jair is
united with Eros (erotic desire).
Jakim, "he set up,"
"standing erect," "raising seed to."
Japho, "beauty,"
"widely extending," "seduce," persuade."
Jehoaddan, "Jah is
lovely," "Yeho is the provider of sexual pleasure."
Jepthel-el, "El is
a begetter."
Jeroham, "a beloved
or favored One."
Jesher, "he is
upright."
Jesimel, "El
creates."
Jeziah, "He is son
of Jah."
Jonathan, "the gift
of Jao" (a God).
Jhoharaph, "Jah is
juicy, vigorous, strong or proud."
Joshar, "he is
straight," "upright."
Jurah, "he boils
up," "to glow, to burn," "to pour out largely."
Kishon, "the firm
or hard On."
Maon ,"pudenda of
On."
Tamar, the palm, an
euphemism for the male organ.
It "ill be
observed, a few of the above name,; refer to the Sun Deity, and solar
worship. In some, the solar and phallic tenets are combined in the
same, name, and depicted in the same figure. Such an illustration
will be found in Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, under the name
Agnus Dei. The figure--lamb, rain, or goat--is in the
impossible attitude of holding a cross with the foot--sometimes a
crosier, or shepherd's crook, either of which are phallic emblems. The
head of the animal is surrounded by a circle, or with rays, which are
always typical of the Sun God. For the Hebrew text of the above names
the reader is referred to "Inman's Ancient Faiths."
MARKS AND SIGNS OF THE TRIAD.
The triad is parent to
the idea of Trinity. It is met with in the most distant countries,
and is traced to Phoenicia, Egypt, on the west, and Japan on the
east, of our hemisphere, and to India. Constituting, as the triad and
yoni did, the ever-dominant thought, and actuated by the narrow realm
of an absorbing self-personality, they formed the basis and spirit of
religious observance. They were referred to openly and broadly, or
more generally and in later times by a mark, a metaphor, a motion, or
a sign. For this sign the letter
T became typical, and still
later the figure of the cross became that sign. "It is most
remarkable," says Payne Knight, that "the letter
T
and the cross, symbols of symbols, are made to represent the male
procreative powers, which are emblems of generation and
regeneration."
Reverse the position of
the triple deities Asher, Anu, Hea and we have the figure of the,
ancient "tau"
T
Of the Christians, Greeks, and ancient, Hebrews--not of the modern
Hebrews. It is one of the oldest conventional forms of the cross. It
is also met with in Gallic, Oscan, Arcadian, Etruscan, original
Egyptian, Phœnician, Ethiopic and Pelasgian. The Ethiopic form
of the "tau" is this
T
the exact prototype and image of the cross; or, rather, to state the
fact in order of merit and position in time, the cross is
made in
the exact image of the Ethopic "tau." The fig-leaf,
having three lobes to it, became a symbol of the triad. As the male
genital organs were
held in early times to
exemplify the actual male creative power, various natural objects
were seized upon to express the theistic idea, and at the same time
point to those parts of the human form. Hence, a similitude was
recognized in a pillar, a heap of stones, a tree between two rocks, a
club between two pine cones, a trident, a thyrsus tied round with two
ribbons With the two ends pendant, a thumb and two fingers, the
caduceus. Again, the conspicuous part of the sacred triad Asher is
symbolized by a single stone placed upright--as in Gilgal in
"Vocabulary," Fig 2. -the stump of a tree, a block, a
tower, spire, minaret, pole, pine, poplar, or palm tree. While eggs,
apples, or citrons, plums, grapes, and the like, represented the
remaining two portions; altogether called phallic emblems.

Fig.3.
Portrays a triad found on a medal of Apollo. The triple points
at the summit are in multiple of the Trinity, as they but repeat the
same idea the structure would express without them. Baal-Shalisha is
a name which seems designed to perpetuate the triad, since it
signifies "my Lord the Trinity," or "my God is three."
We must not omit to
mention other phallic emblems, such as the bull, the ram, the goat,
the serpent, the torch, fire, a knobbed stick, the crozier: and still
further personified, as Bacchus, Priapus, Dionysius, Hercules,
Hermes, Mahadeva, Siva, Osiris, Jupiter, Molech, Baal, Asher, and
others.
If Ezekiel is to be
credited, the triad
T, as Asher, Anu, and Hea, was made of
gold and silver, and was in his day not symbolically used, but
actually employed; for he bluntly says "whoredom was committed
with the images of men," or, as the marginal note has it, images
of "a male" (Ezek. xvi, 17). It was with this god-mark--a
cross in the form of the
letter
T--that Ezekiel was directed to stamp the foreheads of
the men of Judea who feared the Lord (Ezek. ix, 4). In China,
Tau
is Nature's absolute unity.
Thus we find the cross
is the Ethiopic and ancient Hebrew "tau" ת.
The
T is the triad, the triad is Asher, Ann, and Hea--the male
genitals deified--the genitals are pudenda, pudenda means shame or
immodest, and so we arrive at the unavoidable conclusion that the
cross is of sexual origin and purely masculine. It is the sign of a
man-God.
This is not all of the
cross. In ancient days it had a natural counterpart little suspected
by moderns. This essential opposite was denominated the Yoni.
There: is in Hindostan
an emblem of great sanctity, which is known as the Linga-Yoni. It
consists of a simple pillar in the center of a figure resembling the
outline of a conical ear-ring, or an old-fashioned wooden battledore.
Dr. Inman says:

Fig. 4.
"As a Scholar, I had heard that the Greek letter, Delta,
Δ ,
is expressive of the female genital organ both in shape and idea. The
selection of name and symbol was judicious, for the words Daleth דּ
(Hebrew) and Delta (Greek) signify the door of a house, and the
outlet of a river, while the figure reversed, ▼
with the heavy side
above, modestly represents the fringe with which the human delta is
overshadowed."
Yoni is of Sanskrit
origin. Yauna, or Yoni, means (1) the vulva, (2) the womb, (3) the
place of birth, (4) origin, (5) water, (6) a mine, a hole, or pit. As
Asher and Jupiter were the representatives of the male potency, so
Juno and Venus were representatives of the female attribute. Moore,
in his "Oriental Fragments,", says: "Oriental writers
have generally spelled the word, 'Yoni,' which I prefer to write
'IOni.' As Lingham was the vocalized cognomen of the male organ, or
Deity, so IOni was that of hers." Says R.P. Knight: "The
female organs of generation were revered as symbols of the generative
powers of Nature or of matter, as those of the male were of the
generative powers of God. They are usually represented emblematically
by the shell
Concha Veneris, which was therefore worn by
devout persons of antiquity, as it still continues to be by the
pilgrims of many of the common people of Italy" ("On the
worship of Priapus," p. 28). If Asher, the conspicuous feature
of the male Creator, is supplied with types and representative
figures of him self, so the female feature is furnished with
substitutes and typical imagery of herself.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5 is one of
these, and is technically known as the
sistrum of Isis. It is
the virgin's symbol. The bars across the
fenestrum, or
opening, are bent so they cannot be taken out, and indicate that the
door is closed. It signifies that the mother is still
virgo
intacta--a truly immaculate female--if the truth can be strained
to so denominate a
mother. The pure virginity of the Celestial
Mother was a tenet of faith for 2,000 years before the accepted
Virgin Mary now adored was born. We might infer that Solomon
was acquainted with the figure of the
sistrum, when he said,
"A garden inclosed is my spouse, a spring shut up, a
fountain
sealed" (Song of Sol. iv, 12). The
sistrum, we are
told, was only used in the worship of Isis, to drive away Typhon
(evil).

Fig.6.
The Argha, Fig 6.
is a contrite form, or boat-shaped dish or plate used as a
sacrificial cup in the worship of Astarte, Isis, and Venus. Its shape
portrays its own significance. The Argha and
crux ansata were
often seen on Egyptian monuments, and yet more frequently on
bass-reliefs.

Fig.7.
Fig 7. is a Buddhist emblem in which the two triangles
typifying the male and female principles are united by a serpent, the
emblem of desire. It also typifies wisdom.
Equivalent to Iao, or
the Lingham, we find Ab, the Father, the Trinity, Asher, Anu, Hea,
Abraham, Adam, Esau, Edom, Ach, Sol, Helios (Greek for Sun),
Dionysius, Bacchus, Apollo, Hercules, Brahma, Vishnu, Siva, Jupiter,
Zeus, Aides, Adonis, Baal, Osiris, Thor, Oden, the cross, tower,
spire, pillar, minaret, tolmen, and a host of others; while the Yoni
was represented by Io, Isis, Astarte, Juno, Venus, Diana, Artemis,
Aphrodite, Hera, Rhea, Cybele, Ceres, Eve, Frea, Frigga, the queen of
heaven, the oval, the trough, the delta, the door, the ark, the ship,
the chasm, a ring, a lozenge, cave, hole, pit, Celestial Virgin, and
a number of other names. Lucian, who was an Assyrian, and visited the
temple of Dea Syria, near the Euphrates, says there are two phalli
standing in the porch with this inscription on them, "Those
phalli I, Bacchus, dedicate to my step-mother Juno."

Fig.8.
Fig 8. is a
fearless emblem of the maternal door. Jesus is reported to have said,
"I am the door," and some one in a sacred book said, "My
beloved put in his hand by the hole of the door" (Sol. Song v,
4). But this picture is a Buddhist theological badge, showing the God
Siva standing in the ambient yoni, or door; the date of which was
long before the birth of Jesus. It is one of the antecedents of the
Virgin Mary. Mary is a compound word, as many of the deities are
compound deities, composed of male and female principles and pattern.
Mare, or Mar, in the Chaldee, signifies "Lord," the lord or
master, and
ri signifies "the Celestial Mother."
Ri
was the name of an Assyrian Goddess. When these two words are united
in one they form mar-ri, or Mary, a union of father and mother
elements and parts, as portrayed in the above crude figure of
antiquity. Molly is the name of a married, woman, or of a woman with
children. The above diagram comprehends the phallus and unit, under
the designation of Linga-Yoni, the mystical four. The aureole about
the head of the figure is a solar tenet.
From time immemorial to
our day, it is, to be noticed the man is put first and foremost, the
woman next. He is three; she is one. Christians have perpetuated the
triune male God as Abba, father, but left out the mother altogether,
except among the Catholics. The sacred four "dignitaries"--of
which Rev. Cotton Mather said "the Devil is one"--are only
made up by adding Satan, the Typhon or Dagon of antiquity.
Our singular Fig 8.
has, in some measure, descended to comparatively modern
times. In Ireland, up to almost the last century, there were three
Christian churches over whose doors might be seen the coarsely
sculptured figure of a nude woman exposing the
maar (pudenda)
in the most shameless manner, the idea being that the sight thereof
brought good luck. The horse shoe is the modern representative of the
organ in question, and is often fastened over the main entrance door
by the superstitious for the same object.
The Papal religion is
essentially feminine, and built on the ancient Chaldean basis. It
clings to the female element in the person of the Virgin Mary.
Naphtali (Gen. xxx, 8) was a descendant of such worshipers, if there
be any meaning in a concrete name. Bear in mind, names and pictures
perpetuate the faith of many peoples. Neptoah is Hebrew for "the
vulva," and, Al or El being God, one of the unavoidable
renderings of Naphtali is "the Yoni is my God," or "I
worship the Celestial Virgin." The Philistine towns generally
had names strongly connected with sexual ideas. Ashdod,
aish
or
esh, means "fire, heat," and
dod means
"love, to love," "boil up," be agitated,"
the whole signifying "the heat of love," or "the fire
which impels to union." Could not those people exclaim, Our "God
is love?" (I. John iv, 8). The amatory drift of Solomon's Song
is undisguised, though the language is dressed in the habiliments of
seeming decency. The burden of thought of most of it bears direct
reference to the Linga-Yoni. He makes a woman say, "He shall lie
all night betwixt my breasts" (S. of S. i, 13). Again, of the
phallus, or linga, she says, "I will go up to the palm-tree, I
will take hold of the boughs thereof" (vii, 8). Palm-tree and
boughs are euphemisms of the male genitals. Solomon, like the
ancients before him, worshiped at the high sanctuary of sex.
COLOR OF GODS.
One would naturally
suppose the color of a Deity would be the same as the complexion
which belonged to the worshipers of it. Black Gods and Goddesses were
met with among the Egyptians, Hindus, Greeks and Romans--yes, in
Europe.) In explanation of these facts, Dr. Inman remarks that "the
female generative structure in some countries is of a dark or black
color; that Buddha and Brahma were as often painted black as white."
There was a black Venus at Corinth. Osiris, Isis and her child Horus,
were black. A black Virgin and black child are to be seen at St.
Stephens, in Genoa; at St. Francisco, in Pisa; at St. Theodore, in
Munich; and in other places. These Somber facts seem to explain a
passage in the Song of Solomon, where a woman is made to Say, "I
am
black, but comely" (i, 5).
The reason for black
Deities assigned above is less satisfactory than attends the author's
explanations generally; for the same reason may apply among the same
people to their male Gods, which are perhaps more often painted white
or red, and for the same local reason. Mahadeva in India was often
painted red. Some ancient figures of Bacchus, the Greek
personification of Mahadeva, have been found painted red. In the
Townley Collection a bisexual figure of Bacchus was, like his
analogue, Priapus, painted red. Ezekiel says (xxiii, 14), "the
images of Chaldean men portrayed upon the wall were with vermilion."
The experience of those
concerned in opening Etruscan tombs shows that whenever the phallus
is found therein it is painted red. Adam means red or ruddy.
"My beloved [he] is
white and ruddy (Sol. Song V, 10).

Fig.9.
Further generous light is thrown upon the subject of male
sanctities and female worship by a religio-historic gem unearthed at
Nineveh. Fig 9. is a copy of that keepsake. It is an Egyptian seal,
copied from Layard ("Nineveh and Babylon," p.156). On it is
engraved the Egyptian God Harpocrates seated on the mystic lotus in
profound adoration of the Yoni, or
havah, the "Divine
Mother of all," which is set in the field before him.
"Set me as a seal
upon thine heart, as a seal upon thine arm, for love is strong as
death" (Sol. Song viii, 6). Solomon's
seal was in outline
the shape of the unit in the field of Fig 9. The same
lozenge-shaped figure was the symbol of Astarte, the Celestial
Virgin, wherefrom Solomon may have obtained it. Layard and others
state that such homage as is here depicted in the above seal is
actually paid, in some parts of Palestine and India, to the living
symbol, the worshiper, on bended knees, offering to it bread before
he eats it, with or without silent prayer. A corresponding homage is
paid by female devotees to the masculine emblem of the Sheik, or
Patriarch, which is devoutly kissed by all the women of the tribe on
one solemn occasion during the year, when the old ruler sits in state
to receive the homage. The emblem is, for many, of greater sanctity
than the crucifix. Such homage is depicted in Picart's "Religious
Ceremonies of all the People of the World," plate 71.
It may easily be
understood that few people would be so gross as to use in religious
worship true similitudes of these parts, which their owners think it
shame to speak of, and a punishment or reproach publicly to show. As
there is circumlocution in language, so there is symbolism in
sculpture. Words and figures are adopted which are ingeniously vailed
so as not to be understood by the multitude, yet
significant enough to the initiated. The palm-tree, the wine-press,
the pomegranate, the tower, steeple, hand gestures, are quite
innocent in common conversation, while in mythoses they have a hidden
meaning. The scholar is aware there are occasions on which no such
reticence was used, but where an excessive shamelessness prevailed.
Of their nature it is unnecessary to speak further than to say that
the exposures were made with the impulse of a religious idea, such as
that which might have actuated David when he leaped and danced naked
before the ark, and in sight of the women of his household (II. Sam.
vi, 14-20). Moderns who have not been initiated in the ancient
mysteries, and only know the emblems considered sacred, have need of
anatomical knowledge and physiological lore ere they can see the
meaning of many a sign. Note the Greek Delta inverted ▼,
the door of life; likewise the
concha shell, which was held to
typify the same feminine organ.
FISH AND GOOD FRIDAY.
The Fish was a sacred
being. Fish are found among the venerated pictures and sculptured
works of the Buddhists, Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians,
Phœnicians.

Fig.10.
Fig 10. is a Buddhist emblem of the quadruple deity. The
rudimentary fig-leaf at the summit is the triad or male feature. The
fish yield in a fanning bias for the yoni and female person. Imagine
an Oriental priest expounding the mystery of the Godhead and
unfolding, the holy Trinity. While
pointing to the above
figure as the visible expression thereof, he might say--leaving out
one person, as many Christians do--"There are three that bear
witness in earth--the spirit, the water, and the blood--and these
three agree in one" (I. John v, 8). That
one may be the
yoni, though it be not named, neither would he name the fig-leaf
triad, or fish, but all would understand that figurative language
Bays one thing and means two of more.
Tell me, is itreligion
To say, The Gods are three?
To
attain to God, within you
Your search for him must be.
Caldwell's Indian Folk Lore.
The statue of Isis with
her child Horus has a fish on her head; likewise in Fig 12. Ardanari stands with an intrepid dolphin on his or her
head--for one head seems to answer for the two persons.
The modern idea in
regard to the physical influence of fish as an article of diet is,
that it is specially adapted to repair waste brain tissue, on account
of the phosphatic elements it contains. Phosphates are larger
constituents of brain than of other portions of the body. But the
ancients took to fish repasts wholly for another end, and for the
support of a full vein of divine ardor. They believed it benefited
the virile powers. Says Dr. Inman: "I have ascertained that
eating fish for supper on Friday night is a Jewish custom. It is well
known that fecundity among that people is a blessing specially
promised by the Omnipotent. So it is thought proper to use human
means for securing the desired end on the day set apart to the
Almighty"--Almighty Asher of old. "The Hebrew Sabbath
begins at sunset on Friday. Three meals are to be taken during the
day, which are supposed to have a
powerful aphrodisiac operation. The ingredients in their dishes are
meat and fish, garlic and pepper. The particular fish selected, as
near as I can determine, is the skate that which in the Isle of Man
is still supposed to be a powerful satyron?"
Layard remarks: "In
our days, indeed, the Druses of Lebanon, in their secret vespers,
offer a true worship to the sexual parts of the female, and pay their
devotions every
Friday night--that is to say, the day which
was consecrated to Venus, likewise the day in which, on his side, the
Mussulman finds in the code of Mahomet the double obligation to go to
the mosque and to perform the conjugal duty."
Mythology informs us
that the body of Osiris, when killed by Typhon, was carried in a
chest to Byblos, there found by Isis and brought back to Egypt; but
the malignant demon cut up the body, and threw the places away. All
were recovered but the pudenda, which were replaced by a model
thereof, and this image, enshrined in an ark, became one of the
symbols of the God. The missing parts are said to have been eaten by
a fish. Thus we see "the Ark," "the Fish," and
"Good Friday," brought into parallelism. We are also told
that the holy chest (ark) of Isis was carried once in a year, in
November, to the seaside; the priests, during the passage, pouring
drink-offerings of water upon it from the river. The signification of
this lavement must at once be apparent to those who know that the
Hebrew mi in the text signifies not only "water," but
"semen virile."
In the foregoing we have
seen how the eroto-religious feeling of antiquity deified the male
members of the body under Asher, Ann, and Hea. We here perceive the
same genius has divinized the female structure. With a fish diet, the male God was
believed to be
omnipotent and all-powerful. Joshua was the son
of Nun. Nun in Hebrew is the name for fish; it also signifies a
woman, or, rather, the sexual part of a woman.
TORTOISE.
The Tortoise, like the
elephant, ox, ram, goat, ass, serpent, fish, was an object of pious
veneration. In the Hindu mythos, the tortoise was the form taken by
Vishnu in his second Avatar-Incarnation. The statue of the celestial
Venus stands with one foot on the tortoise. Resemblances in form,
similitudes in type, constituting as they did in the Hindu mind the
highest power of expression, logic was found in comparisons. A glance
at

Fig.11.
Fig 11. enables us to understand how the tortoise came to be
regarded as sacred to Venus. It represents, by the extended head and
neck, the acting linga--virile member, a sustainer of creation, a
symbol of regeneration, a renewer of life, a supporter of the world,
a type of omnipotence, and pointing to immortal felicity.
EARTH MOTHER.
"MOTHER Earth"
is a legitimate expression, only of the most general type. Religious
genius gave the female quality to earth with a special meaning. When
once the idea obtained that our world was
feminine, it was
easy to induce the faithful to believe that natural chasms were
typical of that part which characterizes woman. As at birth the new
being emerges from the mother, so it
was supposed that emergence from a terrestrial cleft was equivalent
to a new birth. In direct proportion to the resemblance between the
sign and the thing signified was the sacredness of the chink, and the
amount of virtue which was imparted by passing through it. From
natural chasms being considered holy, the veneration for apertures in
stones, as being equally symbolical, was a natural transition. Holes,
such as we refer to, are still to be seen in those structures which
are called Druidical, both in the British Islands and in India. It is
impossible to say when these first arose; it is certain that they
survive in India to this day. We recognize the existence of the
emblem among the Jews in Isaiah li, 1, in the charge to look "to
the hole of the pit whence ye are digged." We have also an
indication that chasms were symbolical among the same people in
Isaiah lvii, 5, where the wicked among the Jews were described as
"inflaming themselves with idols under every green tree, and
slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of the rocks."
It is possible that the "hole in the wall" (Ezek. viii, 7)
had a similar signification. In modern Rome, in the vestibule of the
church close to the Temple of Vesta, I have seen a large
perforated
stone, in the hole of which the ancient Romans are said to have
placed their hands when they swore a solemn oath, in imitation, or,
rather, a counterpart, of Abraham swearing his servant upon his
thigh--that is, the male organ. Higgins dwells upon these holes and
says: "These stones are so placed as to have a hole under them,
through which devotees passed for religious purposes. There is one of
the same kind in Ireland, called St. Declau's stone. In the mass of
rock at Bramham Crags there is a place made for
the devotees to pass
through. We read in the accounts of Hindostan that there is a very
celebrated place in Upper India, to which immense numbers of pilgrims
go, to pass through a place in the mountains called the Cow's Belly."
In the Island of Bombay, at Malabar Hill, there is a rock upon the
surface of which there is a natural crevice which communicates with a
cavity opening below. This place is used by, the Gentoos as a
purification of their sins, which they say is effected by their going
in at the opening below and emerging at the cavity above--"born
again." The ceremony is in such high repute in the neighboring
countries that the famous Conajee Angria ventured by stealth, one
night, upon the Island, on purpose to perform the ceremony, and got
off undiscovered. The early Christians gave them a bad name, as if
from envy: they called these holes "Cunni Diaboli"
("Anacalypsis," p. 346).

Fig.
12. Ardanari Iswari
Many are the
efforts made to set forth to the eye the conception of Deity in one
person. The idea has evidently been one of growth from the crude to
the more acceptable; and the result attained denotes composite labor.
Fig 12. is a figure of
this kind. It is a copy of an original drawing made by a learned
Hindu pundit, for Win. Simpson, Esq., of London. It represents Brahma
Supreme, who, in the act of creation, made himself double, i.e., male
and female, as indicated by the
crux ansata in the central
part of the figure, which occupies the place of the conjoined triad
and yoni of the original; the original being far too grossly shown
for the public eye. The reader will notice the triad formed by the
thumb and two fingers and serpent in the male hand, while in the
female hand is to be seen a germinating seed, indicative of
reproduction of father and mother. The
whole stands upon a lotus flower, the symbol of androgenity.
This figure is of
interest as a study; not as a work of art, but to measure the
outcropping of primitive ideas. The extremities of the right Bide are
less masculine than those of men, though the broad right shoulder and
chest are conspicuous compared with the feminine left. The dolphin
fish on the head is a supplemental female symbol, as was mentioned
before, on the subject of "Fish and Good Friday." The yoni
and the crescent on the forehead are not distinctly shown in Mr.
Simpson's figure. We have added them in this, in imitation of the
same personage in Moore's "Hindu Pantheon." They denote the
preponderance, of the Yonigic bias of faith over the Lingasic. When
the two personalities-male and female--are thus combined in one, the
mystic number counts as a
FOURFOLD GOD.
Among church
paraphernalia and ecclesiastical ornament we find many mystic
figures. A very ancient and prominent one is been in his form,

Fig.
13.
Fig 13. an oval or egg-shaped ring added to the
T.
This is known as the
crux ansata. What does it mean? It is
another step in the augmentation of the idea of sexual theism. It
means the triad is joined to the unit, which make four. In other
words, it signifies the linga, or phallus, the male God, embraces the
yoni, or female God. "Male and female created he them." We
can only select a few from among a large number of curious, and, many
times, complicated, devices, all of which, with greater or less
conspicuity, portray the prevailing thought of divine lustfulness, as
four in one, and three in one, two in one, or, all as a whole.

Fig.
14.
Fig 14. is a device denoting the triad or
cross connected with the angular yoni. It is a favorite figure placed
upon steeples and prominent parts of church edifices; the lower part
is often formed in a circle or ring.

Fig. 15.
Fig15. is still another. The
T, or cross proper, is
dropped, but the unit and triad condensed in the three balls are
unmistakable. There metaphoric figures are so infinitely varied that
only the learned in them will be apt to recognize their hidden
meaning. What more rational explanation is there for the three gilded
balls over the door of the pawnbrokers' shops than that they
originally represented the triad, and gave color of orthodoxy to
their trade. Fig 16. is another. It is the

Fig. 16.
Egyptian crux ansata and the Christian cross. We see in it
the picture of the same conjugal tenets of four deities in one, as
above stated. But it and Fig 15. indicate the tendency to depart from
the plain
T and become more conventional. The more
conventional, the more is its origin concealed. Fig 16. is seen
repeatedly figured on Egyptian bass-reliefs as held in the hand. But
Fig 17. puts it to another use.

Fig. 17.
Worn as a part of the dress it is called the priest's
pallium. It combines the cross and yoni--the triad and unit--with the
prelate's head passed through the latter. The robe or surplice is a
telltale portion of phallic and yonijic worship. It is common at the
present time in all but the most democratic churches in this country.
The surplice is a figment of woman's dress; it can be traced back to
the Egyptians, Assyrians, Phœnicians, and others, who worshiped
Isis, Astarte, Venus, Iswari and others in that garb. The
priests put on female habiliments in which to perform their sacred
rites, as the most pleasing, characteristic, and to make themselves
like their Creator. On the other hand, women put on male attire. When
religious rule instigates to sex consideration in dress, it is but a
short step to a more overruling consideration of devout sex
intercommunion and behavior, of which see sequel.

Fig. 18.
Another of the
quadruple symbols is Fig 18. the hand, which is both a sign and
gesture. it is copied from the statuette of Isis and child. The three
fingers denote the trinity, the unit is self-evident.

Fig.19.
The Serpent, Fig
19. with his tail in his mouth, is as significant as if is
forbidding. It indicates the conjunction of male and female, also the
ring or unit; it was at the same time a sign of eternity.

Fig.20.
Fig 20. is a picture of two Egyptian deities al worship
before the sacred triad, each holding, in faithful homage, the
crux
ansata.
These visible emblems
may have been needful for an uncultured people, but Paul discarded
them in visible form, though he seems to have clung to them in idea,
or by the "eye of faith." His definition of faith--
i.e.,
"the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things
not
seen"--points to the Linga-Yoni mysteries, and those
mysteries explain his otherwise hidden meaning of faith.
It is curious to be able
to notice, in the present year of the world, how the fourfold
conception of the unseen powers of the universe exists among
ourselves. Throughout our churches a Trinity is worshiped, and a
fourth power deprecated: the
beneficent is portrayed as three, the malignant one--Typhon of
antiquity, or the Devil of modern orthodoxy--is depicted as single.
In Roman Catholic countries, on the other hand, the Godhead is
painted as it was in Babylon: i. e., the male triad with the female
unit. In Gen. xxiii, 2, we find Arba, which signifies "giant
Baal," or "Baal-Hercules;" the correct etymons appear
to be
Arba-el, "God is fourfold," or

Fig.21.
simply the Armaic Arba "four." And--strange to say,
if it were not so common--the worshipful four is allied with
erva,
the pudenda of both sexes. Fig 21. is a quadruple God planted in the
centre of an elaborately carved yoni with a
urethra or
conduit, the elephant, the emblem of strength and Almighty power,
Standing near, and a devotee below. It is to be borne in mind, there
were in India different sects, as in our time. One, the Lingacitas,
who worshiped the Trinity, or male Deity, whose emblem is Fig. 22,
and the sect of Yonijas, or worshipers of woman, as figured above.
There is, indeed, no
single Papal church, whether chapel or cathedral, to which the name
Beth-Arbel, "Fourfold God," would not apply; for all are
types in which adoration is paid to the undivided trinity in unity,
and the Celestial Virgin, the mother of God and man. The name has
also been traced to the Hebrew
ar and
bel: i.e., "a
hero is Bel," or, "Bel is powerful."
MERU.
The learned Higgins, an
English judge, who for some years spent ten hours a day in
antiquarian studies, Says that Moriah, of Isaiah and Abraham, is the
Meru of the Hindus, and the
Olympus of the Greeks. Solomon built high places for Ashtoreth,
Astarte, or Venus, which became mounts of Venus,
mons
veneris--Meru and Mount Calvary--each a slightly elevated
skull-shaped mount that might be represented by a bare head. The
Bible translators perpetuate the same idea in the word "calvaria."
Prof. Stanley denies that "Mount Calvary" took its name
from its being the place of the crucifixion of Jesus. Looking
elsewhere and in earlier times for the bare calvaria, we find among
Oriental women, the Mount of Venus,
mons veneris, through
motives of neatness or religious sentiment, deprived of all hirsute
appendage.

Fig. 22.
See a Mount Calvary, in imitation, in the shaved poll of the
head of the priest, Fig. 17. The priests of China, says, Mr. J. M.
Peebles, continue to shave the head. To make a place holy, among the
Hindus, Tartars, and people of Thibet, it was necessary to have a
Mount Meru. also a Linga-Yoni, or Arba, Fig 22.
RELIGIOUS PROSTITUTION.
Passing from figures,
paintings, statuary, ornaments and symbols, it is requisite to notice
the religious observances, the actual practice of the faith held by
the world's primal worshipers.
It would appear, or
rather it does appear, that phallic worship, or religion, was, first,
an instinct or passion; second, it was a privilege and luxury; third,
it was a pastime or calling; fourth, it became dominating and
imperative; fifth, by euphemistic transformation, it was merged into the Hebrew
cultus; and seventh, the Hebrew cultus was further modified into the
Christian religion. In support of the first proposition that it was
instinctive, or passion, and sexual passion at that, we have the law
which ruled out those male devotees whose damaged sexual structure
disqualified them for actuating their rites (Deut. xxiii, 1): "He
that is wounded in the testicles, or hath his privy member cut off,
shall not enter the congregation of the Lord." The above
quotation also offers a shoulder of support to our second
proposition, namely, that their religious rites were a privileged
luxury. As men were inspected in regard to fitness, women were
provided in view of that fitness.
In Num. xxxi, 18 and 35,
we are assured, without a lisp or a twinge of horror, that thirty-two
thousand Midianitish virgins were consecrated to this end. We need
not go into details about the manner in which the sacrifice was made;
but we must call attention to the fact that a Christian church still
promulgates the same idea, in an alleged spiritual form, and that the
nunneries of Christendom are vailed, perhaps decent, counterparts of
those Oriental establishments where women consecrated their bodies
and. themselves to fulfil the special duties of their sex, so they
were taught in the name and for the glorification of their Deity.
There was a temple in
Babylonia where every female had to perform once in her life a (to
us) strange act of religion: namely, prostitution with a stranger.
The name of it was
Bit-Shagatha, or, "The Temple,"
the "Place of Union."
Words and history
corroborate each other, or are apt to do so if cotemporaneous. Thus
kadesh, or kaesh, designate in Hebrew "a
consecrated one," and history tells the unworthy tale in
descriptive plainness, as will be shown in the sequel.
That the religion was
dominating and imperative is determined by Deut. xvii, 12, where
presumptuous refusal to listen to the priest was death to the
offender. To us it is inconceivable that the indulgence of passion
could be associated with religion, but so it was. Much as it is
covered over by altered words and substituted expressions in the
Bible--an example of which see
men for male organ, Ezek. xvi,
17--it yet stands out offensively bold. The words expressive of
"sanctuary," "consecrated," and "Sodomite,"
are in the Hebrew essentially the same. They indicate the passion of
amatory devotion. It is among the Hindus of to-day as it was in
Greece and Italy of classic times; and we find that "holy women"
is a title given to those who devote their bodies to be used for
hire, the price of which hire goes to the service of the temple.
As a general rule, we
may assume that priests who make or expound the laws, which they
declare to be from God, are men, and, consequently, through all time,
have .thought, and do think, of the gratification of the masculine
half of humanity. The ancient and modern Orientals are not
exceptions. They lay it down as a momentous fact that virginity is
the most precious of all the possessions of a woman, and, being so,
it ought, in some way or other, to be devoted to God.
Throughout India, and
also through the densely inhabited parts of Asia, and modern Turkey,
there is a class of females who dedicate themselves to the service of
the Deity whom they adore; and the rewards accruing from their
prostitution are devoted to the service of the temple and the priests
officiating therein. With an eye to piety and pelf, the clerical
officials at the Hindu shrines take effectual means for procuring
none but the most fascinating women for the use of their worshipers.
The same practice prevailed at Athens, Corinth, and elsewhere, where
the temples of Venus were supported by troops of women, who
consecrated themselves, or were dedicated by their parents, to the
use of the male worshipers. In modern times, reform and improvements
have been effected; but it is certain that intercourse between the
sexes in sacred places is common in India at the present day. The
Hebrew word
zanah, which signifies "
semen emittere,"
was the name of a woman who lived and practiced the same rite outside
of the temple, from motives other than those esteemed pious. Feasts
and holy days were devoted to this passion, and generally concluded
with excess.
SHAGA.
In the Assyrian
language, Shaga signifies "a feast." The nature of this
feast is explained by Diodorus Siculus. He says: "Our Gala or
Solar days begin with fasting as a prelude to another form of sensual
enjoyment." A detailed description of one of them conveys only a
proximate idea of them. The most disgraceful of the Babylonian
customs is the following: "Every native woman is obliged once in
her life to sit in the temple of Venus and have intercourse with a
stranger. And many, disdaining to mix with the rest, being proud on
account of their wealth, dome in covered carriages, and take up their
station at the temple with a numerous train of servants attending
them. But the far greater do thus: Many sit down in the temple of
Venus wearing a crown of cord around their
heads; some are continually coming in, others are going out; passages
marked out in a straight line lead in every direction through the
women, along which strangers pass and make their choice. When a woman
has once seated herself, she must not return home until some stranger
has thrown a piece of silver into her lap, and lain with her outside
of the temple. He who throws the silver must say thus: 'I beseech the
Goddess Mylitta to favor thee,' Mylitta being the Assyrian name for
Venus. The silver may be ever so small, for she will not reject it,
inasmuch as it is unlawful for her to do so, for such silver is
accounted sacred. The woman follows the first man that throws, and
refuses none. When she has had intercourse, and has absolved herself
from her goddess, she returns home. Those that are endowed with
beauty and symmetry of shape are so-on set free, but the deformed are
detained a long time from inability to satisfy the law: some wait for
the space of three or four years."
A similar custom exists
in some parts of Cyprus. This custom is referred to in I. Sam. ii,
22, where "the sons of Eli lay with the women that assembled at
the door of the tabernacle of the congregation." It is needless
to say for the benefit of the captious that the temple of the
Assyrians was the tabernacle of the Hebrews. In both were
congregations of the Lord. In both the holy presence of their God was
made manifest.
COMMUNION
Has long been a custom
in Christendom. Without explaining the origin of this custom, it will
here suffice to give an example of it in early times, as an index of
its character. Says S. B. Gould ("Origin of Religious Belief"):
"The idea involved in communion is the reception of something
from God. By prayer, man asks something; by purification, he makes
himself meet to approach God; by communion, he receives what he
desires. of Deity by union with him."
The methods adopted by
different religions for accomplishing the desired union are numerous.
The grossest and most repulsive is by sexual intercourse. The
numerous legends and myths representing the union of Gods and women
(as in Gen. vi, 2), or men and Goddesses, are reminiscences of
ancient mysteries, the object of which was to effect such a union. At
the summit of the temple of Belus was a chamber in which was a bed
beside a figure of gold; the same was to be seen in Egyptian Thebes,
says Herodotus, and every night a woman was laid in this bed, to
which the God was supposed to descend. The same took place at Patara
in Lycia, where a priestess was locked into the temple every night.
Diodorus alludes to the tombs of the concubines of Jupiter Ammon, and
Strabo says the fairest and noblest ladies were vowed to share his
couch. It is easy to see how the obscene orgies celebrated during
some of the festivals of the Gods rose out of this superstition. "The
prince, head of Agapemone, as the impersonation of Deity, performed
the sexual act with a young girl in the presence of the whole
community, professedly in order to make her thereby a partaker of the
divine nature."
In Casgrain's "
Vie
de Marie de l'Incarnation" is a frank confession of the
bearing of erotic sanctimony, nearer home than the above. This Marie,
a woman of intense piety and heroism, says of herself in her journal:
"Going to prayer, I trembled in myself and exclaimed, 'Let us go
into a solitary place, my dear love, that I may embrace you,
a mon
aise (at my ease), and that, breathing my soul into you, it may
be but yourself only, in the union of love. Oh, my love, when shall I
embrace you? Have you no pity on me in the torments that I suffer?
Alas, alas I my love, my beauty, my life! instead of healing my pain,
you take pleasure in it. Come, let me embrace you, and die in your
sacred arms!' . . . Then, as I was spent with fatigue, I was forced
to say, 'My divine love, since you wish me to live, I pray you let me
rest a little, that I may better serve you'; and I promised him that
afterward I would suffer myself to consume in his chaste and divine
embraces." From a similar source, we find it stated that St
Christina, a virgin and abbess, believed herself to have received
favors which left her no longer a virgin.
The state of society and
that of the public mind evinced by such social habits may not be
considered depraved: they were undeveloped. Society had not risen
above the crude; the moral mind had not reached the status of chaste
refinement. With so prodigal a use of virtue, immodesty was without a
contrast and without a name. Therefore these customs were inspired by
the same artful and self-involving spirit which inspired the Assyrian
and Hindu priests to invent a special hell for childless women. A
relic of the same spirit continues in modern times among Christians,
where masses have been said, saints invoked, offerings presented, for
the cure of physical impotence.
The above is further
testimony in proof of our first proposition: that the primitive
religion in this early day of adolescent manhood was purely passion
consecrated and sanctified--a religion of
feeling. It was a
physical heaven counterpoised by
a physical hell. Promises were sensuous bliss, and punishments were
bodily woe. A religion of intellect or reason, apart from corporeal
touch, seems unknown to them. It was based on the dynamics of nerve.
We must notice how this
sexual faith has come down to recent times, and how it constitutes
the framework of certain modern observances.
BUNS AND RELIGIOUS CAKES.
Says Hyslop: "The
hot cross-buns of Good Friday, and the dyed eggs of Pasch or Easter
Sunday, figured in the Chaldean rites just as they do now. The buns
known, too, by that identical name were used in the worship of the
Queen of Heaven, the Goddess Easter (Ishtar or Astarte), as early as
the days of Cecrops, the founder of Athens, 1,500 years before the
Christian era." "One species of bread," says Bryant,
"'which used to be offered to the gods, was of great antiquity,
and called
Boun.' Diogenes mentioned 'they were made of flour
and honey.'" It appears that Jeremiah the Prophet was familiar
with this lecherous worship. He says: "The children gather wood,
the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead the dough to make
cakes to the Queen of Heaven (Jer. vii, 18). Hyslop does not add that
the "buns" offered to the Queen of Heaven, and in
sacrifices to other deities, were framed in the shape of the sexual
organs, but that they were so in ancient times we have abundance of
evidence.
Martial distinctly
speaks of such things in two epigrams, first wherein the male organ
is spoken of, second wherein the female part is commemorated,. the
cakes being made of the finest
flour, and kept especially for the palate of the fair one.
Captain Wilford
("Asiatic Researches," viii, p 365) says: "When the
people of Syracuse were sacrificing to Goddesses, they offered cakes
called
mulloi, shaped like the female organ, and in some
temples where the priestesses were probably ventriloquists they so
far imposed on the credulous multitude who came to adore the Vulva as
to make them believe that it spoke and gave oracles."
We can understand how
such things were allowed in licentious Rome, but we can scarcely
comprehend bow they were tolerated in Christian Europe, as, to all
innocent surprise, we find they were, from the second part of the
"Remains of the Worship of Priapus": that in Saintonge, in
the neighborhood of La Rochelle, small cakes baked in the form of the
phallus are made as offerings at Easter, carried and presented from
house to house. Dulare states that in his time the festival of Palm
Sunday, in the town of Saintes, was called
le fete des
pinnes--feast of the privy members--and that during its
continuance the women and children carried in the procession a
phallus made of bread, which they called a
pinne, at the end
of their palm branches; these
pinnes were subsequently blessed
by the priests, and carefully preserved by the women during the year.
Palm Sunday! Palm, it is to be remembered, is an euphemism of the
male organ, and it is curious to see it united with the phallus in
Christendom. Dulare also says that, in some of the earlier inedited
French books on cookery, receipts are given for making cakes of the
salacious form in question, which are broadly named. He further tells
us those cakes Symbolized the male, in Lower Limousin, and especially at Brives, while the
female emblem was adopted at Clermont, in Auvergne, and other places.
ANTIQUITY OF THE CROSS.
In a work entitled "The
Celtic Druids," by Godfrey Higgins, occurs this strong statement
"Few causes have been more powerful in producing mistakes in
ancient history than the idea, hastily formed by all ages, that every
monument of antiquity marked with a cross, or with any of those
symbols which they conceived to be monograms of Christ, were of
Christian origin. The cross is as common in India as in Egypt or
Europe." The Rev. Mr. Maurice says ("Indian Antiquities"):
"Let not the piety of the Catholic Christian be offended at the
assertion that the cross was one of the most usual symbols of Egypt
and India. The emblem of universal nature is equally honored in the
Gentile and Christian world. In the cave of Elephanta in India, over
the heal of the principal figure, may be seen the cross, and a little
in front a huge lingham (male organ)." The last-named author
describes a statue in Egypt as bearing a kind of a cross in his
hand--that is to say, a lingham--which. among the Egyptians was the
symbol of fertility. Upon the breast of one of the Egyptian mummies
in the museum of the London University is a cross exactly in the
shape of

Fig.23.
Fig 23. namely, a cross upon a Calvary, a Meru, or Mount of
Venus. People in the above-named countries marked their sacred water
jars, dedicated to Canopus, with
T or this

.
Sometimes they were marked thus

From the erudite Dr. G. L. Ditson, on this subject, we learn:
"The rabbins say that when Aaron was
made high priest he was marked in the forehead by Moses with the
figure
X. And whenever proselytes were admitted into the
religious mysteries of Eleusis they were marked with a cross."
Tertullian says: "The Devil signed his soldiers with the cross
in the forehead in imitation of the Christians."
CRUCIFIXION.
From the cross we are
naturally led to the topic of crucifixion. Many Deities have been
crucified. Christ was preceded by Christna, Prometheus, Esculapius,
Wittoba, and Buddha. They were all crucified Redeemers long before
Jesus of Nazareth was born. They were all sons of virgins: So say
mythological accounts.
In view of the prevalent
ideas in relation to the cross, it is singular and more than strange
that the cross is not to be seen on any ancient sculpture as an
instrument of punishment. In none of the ancient gems pictured by
Layard is any form of the cross except the
crux ansata to be
found. In the Ninevite remains, the punishment which is depicted of
the vanquished is impalement. We are told by Herodotus (Book III,
159) that, after the taking of Babylon, Darius impaled about three
thousand of its principal citizens, and his plan, Seneca tells us,
was one carried out among the Romans. When the cross was made of two
pieces of wood, there seems to have been no orthodox shape, and the
victims were sometimes, tied and sometimes nailed, being usually left
to perish of thirst and hunger. We learn from Juvenal that
crucifixion was a punishment for slaves.
Whether the story of the
crucifixion of Jesus has any better foundation than the myths of
antiquity, like those relating to Christna,
Wittoba, and Prometheus, we will not discuss: but it is pertinent to
our subject to speak of the idea which possessed the minds of
Christian bishops that met in the third century at Nicca, and
determined that the cross should be the characteristic emblem of the
Catholic faith. We may admit that they regarded the emblem as a sign
of the death of the Redeemer by a painful method; but we must believe
that the astute bishops of Africa and the East recognized in it the
emblem of fertility. Their doctrine was that all men were dead in
sins, but that through Christ they received life. Shorn of palpable
phallic immodesty, and of all its offensive indications, there was
nothing in the symbol of the cross to offend the eye, while they were
able to attach to it much that suggested certain doctrines. From it
alone, as from a text, one hierarch might expatiate on the sufferings
of the Savior, while another might dwell on the glories of the
resurrection; one might paint the horrors of eternal death, another
the glories or eternal life; one might view it as a man with arms
outstretched so as to secure the whole world under his care, another
as an emblem pointing two ways--one to heaven, the other to hell.
Whatever may have been
its precedents, one thing seems to be perfectly certain, that its
form was extremely simple, and that every modern addition, namely,
the addition of the circle and the triple ornaments, is a return to
ancient heathenism, a commingling of ancient tenets with modern
dogmas.
Higgins (p. 70) gives an
account of the crucifixion of Salivahana, Wittoba, and Buddha, who
were Hindu divinities, and figured in a drawing (Ball, ii) from the
famous temple of the crucified Wittoba at Tripetty. These differ in no respect
from the crucified Jesus with which we are familiar. A halo of glory
shiner upon his head, on which there is a crown, serrated with sharp
angler, on its upper margin. The hands are extended, the feet are
slightly separated, and all are marked with stigmata--the notable
nail prints. These are pictures of the imagination, instead of
pictures of reality.
The resemblance between
Christna and Christ is too striking not to append a short sketch of
the Hindu God, and compare their likenesses.
CHRISTNA
Was mouldy with years
ere Jesus was born. He is one of the most popular of all the Hindu
Deities. An immense number of legends are told of him which are not
worth recording, but the following, condensed from the "Anacalypsis,"
of Godfrey Higgins, will repay perusal. It appears to be the
legitimate fountain from which that of Christ springs.
He is represented as the
son of Brahma and Maria, or as some say of Devaci, and is usually
called "the Savior," or the preserver. He, being God,
became incarnate in the flesh. As soon as he was born, he was saluted
by a chorus of devatars, or angels. His birthplace was Mathura. He
was cradled among shepherds. Soon after his birth he was carried away
by night to a remote place, for fear of a tyrant, Cansa, whose
destroyer it was foretold he would become) and who ordered all male
children to be slain. (An episode marked in the sculptures at
Elephanta; and over the head of this slaughtering figure, surrounded
by supplicating mothers and murdered male infants, are the
mitre,
a
crosier, and a
cross.) By the male line he was of
royal descent, though born in a dungeon, which on his arrival he
illuminated, while the face of his parents shone. He was believed to
be born of the left intercostal rib of the Virgin Davaci. Christna
spoke as soon as he was born and comforted his mother. He was
persecuted by his brother Ram, who helped him to purify the world of
monsters and demons. Christna descended into Hades and returned to
Viacontha. One of his names is the Good Shepherd. An Indian prophet,
Nared-Saphos, or Wisdom, visited him, consulted the stars, and
pronounced him a celestial being. Christna cured a leper; a woman
poured a box of ointment on his head, and he cured her of disease. He
was chosen king among his fellow cowherds. He washed the feet of
Brahmins. Christna had a dreadful fight with the serpent Caluga. He
was sent to a tutor, whom be astonished with his learning. Christna
was crucified between two thieves, went to hell, and afterward to
heaven.
The story of Jesus of
Nazareth is so identical with that of Christna in name, origin,
office, history, incidents, and death, as to make it manifest that
the latter was copied from the earlier almost entire. Some whose
reverent sympathy feels hurt at the thought that the story of Christ
may not be original try to maintain that Christna's is subsequent to
Christ. But the following points of historic fact afford a burden of
proof that puts a bar to controversy thereon. "It has been
satisfactorily proved, on the authority of a passage in Adrian, that
the worship of Christna was practiced in the time of Alexander the
Great (330 years before Christ), at what still remains one of the
most famous temples of India, the temple of Mathura, on Jumna, the
Matura Deorum of Ptolemy. Further, the statue of the God Christna is
to be found in the very oldest caves and temples, the inscriptions on which are in a language
used previously to the Sanskrit, and now totally unknown to all
mankind. This may be seen any day among the places in the city of
Seringham and at the temple at Malvalipurram."
Why were these twins,
Christna and Christ, born in eras so divergent, with incidents so
identical?
The Sun was a majestic
Deity, revered among many peoples. Volumes would be required to give
the history of the Sun God and his worshipers. We here advert to him
and speak of a act or two in order to show he has not been neglected,
also to indicate his good standing among the other Gods in general,
as well as among inhabitants of earth.
It is a moot-point
whether the worship of sexual appointments as Sovereign Creator and
the foundation of the great thought of creation had priority, or
whether solar worship had precedence. Looking at the fact that
physical development moves in a free advance of the rational and
philosophical, that impulse outstrips inquiring thoughtfulness, that
phallic religion is purely one of feeling and passion, while solar
faith involves more of the mental structure--a slower and later
outgrowth of man--would, in the nature of things indicate sex worship
to be long anterior to that of the sun. The one is practical and
matter-of-fact. The other is inferential and imaginary. Youth would
swell the eager votaries in one; maturity and age would cultivate the
other: for there are infancy, youth, and maturity, in nations, and
society, as well at; in individuals.
Without deciding which
may be the older, we find them mixed. The phallic or linga-yoni
worship and that of the sun were not merely cotemporaneous with each
other: they were tenets which mingled together under the same faith. All had
the same or similar significance; both embody sex divinity. The sun
was male and the moon and earth were females; the moon, an attendant
emblem of the feminine Deities, and the earth, with the aid of
concurring deities, gave birth to man. Fig 24. represents certain
articles of

Fig.24.
this complex faith, sculptured on agate, which is copied by
Lajara from the original. in Calvert's Museum at Avignon. It proves
the existence of solar and phallic worship at an early period of the
world. It is worthy of study. We see the sun and moon in proximity,
and the priest in female habiliments--like those of the Catholic and
Episcopalian priests of to-day--adoring the male trinity in the form
of the triangle near the hand of the hierarch; while on the right
side of the sacred chair, or "throne," is the mystic
palm-tree of male significance, and on the left and front of the
devotee is the never-to-be-forgotten lozenge, unit, or yoni.
Altogether they form the great four, the male and female Creators,
Preservers, and Regenerators of the world. This is really one of the
most comprehensive revelations of ancient faiths, in a small compass,
yet brought to light. It deserves more than a passing notice. The
male and female counterparts of the human form are viewed as palpable
Creators and Regenerators in the most immediate as well as the most
continuous sense. The idea that the imperial Sun is the only other
all-powerful, omnipresent Creator known to man agrees with modern
science. The scientific high priests of to-day, like Mayers and
Tyndall, inform us that all forces manifest to man
on this planet, except those of earthquakes, tides and gravitation,
proceed from the sun. Every plant and every animal is each a product
of the sun. Every steam engine moves by means of force derived from
the sun: force shot in beams of heat and light from his beneficent
breast millions of years ago; here condensed in teeming vegetation,
and re-condensed in silent, sleeping beds of coal in the womb of
mother earth. The shrill whistle of every steam engine in the
startled air may be interpreted as an appropriate pean sounded in
honor of the everlasting God Sol. Though he has reared a majestic
living world like ours, and maintains the continuity of life upon it
from year to year, and from age to age, yet only a small portion of
his rays are spent upon the theater of our grand old globe. Grand to
us, but a speck in the universe of worlds.
As we quoted Bible names
in proof of the faith of the ancient fathers who gave to their
children certain good names of phallic import, so we refer to a few
in illustration of the faith in the sun men cherished, the proud
ruler of, earth and heaven. In the Vedas, the sacred books of the
Hindus, the sun has twenty different names, not pure equivalents, but
appelatives descriptive of it, such as Brilliant, Beneficent,
Beautiful, Creator, Master, Preserver. The Sanskrit Deva, "Splendor,"
is one of them.
Aaron, "the
Heavenly On," "the God of Air."
Abigal, "the Father
of the Circle," i. e., "the Sun."
Abram, "the Father
is high."
Ahasbai, "Jah is
shining," "God is blooming."
Ammiel, "the
Maternal Sun."
Amalek, "Mother
King," or "Mother Sun."
Elijah. This innocent is
weighted with the names of two Gods at once, the El of the Chaldees,
and Jah of the Hebrews, which signifies "El is Jah."
El and Ilos were
Babylonian names of the "Sun God."
Esthon, "the
Uxorious On."
Ether, "fullness,"
A God in the Assyrian triad, his colleagues being the Sun and Moon.
His name may be read Eva, Iva, Air, Aer, Aur, Er, Ar, also Vul.
Hai, "female power
of the Sun."
Helon, "God Sun,"
"El is On."
Jahmai, "Jah is
hot."
Malcham, "the Queen
of Heaven," wife of Asher.
Mishael, "El is
firmness," or, "El is powerful," or, "El is
Mish," the Sun.
Naashon, "Shining
On."
Potiphar (Coptic),
"belonging to the Sun."
Punon, "the Setting
On."
Samson or Shimshon,
"Shemesh is On," or "On is the Sun."
Like many others, the
Sun was it crucified God. "It is certainly proved as completely
as it is possible in the nature of things for a fact of this kind to
be proved that the Romans had a crucified object of adoration of the
God Sol (Sun)--represented in some way to have been crucified. The
cross was ail emblem of the sun, though rarely. met with in Assyrian
and Babylonian sculptures. Besides the
crux ansata, the most
remarkable which I have heard of is a votive offering found near
Numidia in 1833, on which was a man surrounded with a wreath of
beams, with both arms stretched out and holding a branch in
each hand, thus representing
a perfect cross. Below him was this surprising inscription, which
reads as translated by Gesenius, '
To the Lord Baal, the Solar
King eternal, who has heard prayers.' Kindred to this it must be
noticed that, in many ancient pictures of our Saviour in Italy, the
words
Deo Soli are inscribed, which signify, alike, 'to the
only God,' and 'to the God Sol.' Solomon built temples to the Sun God
Chemosh (II. Kings xxiii, 13)," ("Inman's Ancient Faiths").
Sex worship being the
most natural, the most personal or self-relating, and ever associated
with physical maturity, we may safely conclude it to have had
spontaneous origin in widely separated localities. As it arose in
India it may have likewise arisen elsewhere. At all events, we
believe India and the East are not the only places where the vestiges
of it are found. There is reason to think the aboriginal people of
California had phallic and yonigic usages, if those usages did not
amount to a religious faith. In support of this view several stone
relics of antiquity give evidence, if it be proper to base a
conclusion upon the study of a few specimens.
The first of the kind it
was my fortune to

Fig
25.
inspect was a stone phallus I obtained on the Big Solado
Creek in the foot-hills of Stanislaus County, California. It is
cylindrical in shape, nearly sixteen inches long, and two and a
quarter inches in diameter. The second one is represented in the cut,
Fig 25. It is formed of basaltic rock, is eighteen inches in length,
and two and one fourth inches in diameter at the largest part. These
are commonly called "Indian pestles." But this appears to
be a swift and too easy conclusion. To be so carefully wrought out of
obdurate rock for the object of pestles implies a poor adaptation to
the supposed use. It elevates the autochthon's constructive above his
applied skill. These phalli show no marks of wear, the larger ends
having the same appearance of disuse as the smaller. A specific
feature denoting weighty proof that our specimens are sexual emblems
of the male organ cannot be overlooked. Near the summit of the lesser
end of Fig 25. is a well-defined depressed line which typifies the
adult uncircumcised prepuce, in semi-recession upon the glands.
C. C. Jones
("Antiquities of Southern Indians") says: "The worship
of Priapus probably obtained among some of the Southern Indian
nations. In the collection of Dr. Troost were many carefully carved
representations in stone of the male organ of generation."
Another point worthy of
note is the fact that the length of the so-called pestles exceeds
that of nearly every other celt, as figured by Lubbock, Evans, or
Jones.
The latter depicts a stone ax and handle in
one piece, fifteen and three fourths inches long; a spade and handle,
cut from solid rock, seventeen and a quarter inches long. Only one
specimen has a length greater then the phalli; that is a flint sword
which measures a little over twenty-one inches long.
Like all Gods, the parts
which make the person are human or mundane; the divinity, thereof
consists in office and proportion. To be godlike, those proportions
must be exorbitant, as we not only here, witness, but as may be seen
in most of the virile members figured on the bass-reliefs exhumed
from the buried cities of Herculaneum and Pompeii. All present the
same excess in the divine gift of magnitude--a never-failing
attribute of the Almighty.

Fig.
26.
Fig 26. is a
unique specimen, the original of which accompanied Fig 25. They are
both in the collection of the Academy of Sciences in San Francisco,
Cal., but without history except such as may be read from each as an
individual fact. This oval-shaped relic has been denominated a
"mortar." But that term seems a misnomer. The object
departs from the type of the mortar. Other vessels in the collection
that are unquestioned mortars have a less elaborate finish, and all
strictly conform to the one idea of rough utility. This specimen Fig
26. is fourteen inches long, nine inches broad, and six inches high.
It is not polished, but it has all even smoothness on the outer
surface. The oblong cavity, which is nearly three inches deep, allows
quite sharp pits of hammer or delving
tool marks, which in the mortars proper these marks are very much
effaced, as if by attrition of use. The base of the mortars have each
a consistent flat bottom to rest on, while the underside of the celt
in question is oval, making it unstable as an egg.
I find no diagram or
description of a stone relic of this kind in Sir John Lubbock's
"Prehistoric Times," Evans' "Stone Relies of England,"
or C. C. Jones, Jr.'s "Antiquities of Southern Indiana."
Though the direct
evidence is small, the foregoing indirect evidence leads us to regard
the relic purely a sacred emblem of the female type, answering to the
yoni of India, and a companion to the phallus.
Speaking to an educated
woman of the ancient meaning and remarkable origin of the cross, she
inquired, "What, the cross of Christ?" Her unconsciousness
that it had any other relation than that pertaining to the
crucifixion of Jesus illustrates a prevailing lack of historical
knowledge in most people throughout Christendom. The hope to bring
within the reach of the average man of letters a chapter of
mythological lore which has heretofore been confined to the few is
one motive for offering these pages to the public.
There is no truth but is
productive of good. The dynamics of knowledge are impatient of rest
and mental inertia. Science and historical criticism are opening many
fields long hid in myth and conjecture.
It is hoped the line of
discussion here adopted will explain some portions of Bible
literature which have always stood in the attitude of offensive
enigma to cultured thought. Improved taste of modern time must
question the crudities of former days, and ask the reason why.
Natural forces give direction to usage, and type to habits. The same
agencies modify and polish them. The hallowed powers of one era
become. detritus of a later one; and in still later eons of time
those decayed objects reappear as relies, and show, to our surprise,
how much that is held to be
original in our age is really the unconscious inheritance of a bygone
ancestry. They also show early religious ideas were cast in a mold
denoting a childlike apprehension, in conformity with things
palpable, and roundly pronounced, with the child's direct bluntness
of expression.
Ancient religious
literature is conspicuous for the number of Gods held in veneration.
We find in Christendom but three, or, at most, four. Explanation of
the "Trinity" and the natural origin of those four great
creative, all-absorbing Gods are here elucidated upon historic and
well-nigh scientific bases. As all science demands illustrations
addressed to the eye, as well as argument to the mental perception,
so, in the treatment of our theo-scientific theme, over twenty-five
illustrations are introduced to aid the text.
The Phallic and Yonijic
remains found in California, are in these pages, for the first time,
so fur as known to the author, introduced to public attention as
ancient religious relies belonging to the prehistoric stone age.
Those who have perused
Inman's "Ancient Faiths," Higgins' "Anacalypsis"
and his "Celtic Druids," Payne Knight's "Worship of
Priapus," Layard's "Nineveh," papers of Dr. G. L.
Ditson and others relating to kindred subjects, know the authentic
sources of much of the information here briefly uttered.
SHA ROCOO.
January 1, 1874.
END
End Notes
[1] So much for Victorian science. Aren't we lucky to live in such an age
of enlightenment where safe sex is now taught in the schools.
Back to Hargrave Jennings Rosicrucians